Abstract
This article focuses on the importance of dividends and why dividend stocks should be considered in a portfolio. It explains pitfalls to avoid when choosing dividend growth stocks and when active management might be the most suitable option.
Access fee
- Non-subscribers - $40 for three-month access
- Full Radar subscribers – free
Abstract
Alternative investments can be viewed as exposures or strategies that provide different and unique return streams from those offered by traditional equity and fixed-income investments. These different return streams are generally the result of unique characteristics relative to traditional equities and bonds, such as lower correlations, unique volatility patterns or unique up/down capture ratios. Alternative investments are broken into three categories: Alternative Markets, Alternative Investment Approaches and Absolute Return Strategies. An overview of “Alternatives” as an asset class and their power to reduce risk and enhance returns is provided. The key considerations associated with implementing “alternatives” in client portfolios is explored.
Access fee
- Non-subscribers - $40 for three-month access
- Full Radar subscribers – free
Abstract
The pitfalls of the traditionally favoured buy-and-hold investment strategies over active or tactical investment strategies are discussed. The Holy Grail market timing model and how it works to avoid some of the pitfalls of traditional strategies is described. Using the Holy Grail market timing model, and Robert Shiller’s S&P 500 data series over the 140 year period from 1871 to 2012, how the model achieves capital preservation in bad times and capital appreciation in good times is explained. The factors that underlie the Holy Grail model’s success over the conventional buy-and-hold strategies are identified.
Access fee
- Non-subscribers - $40 for three-month access
- Full Radar subscribers – free
Abstract
Active share is an important manager evaluation tool but it does not necessarily translate into superior returns. It is one of several risk measures which can help assess a manager, but it gives no indication of manager skill. High active share is often profiled as "better" but it creates a dilemma – portfolios can exhibit risk concentrations which may lead to volatile return streams for investors. Low active share funds should not be excluded from asset allocators' tool kit. Investing in low active share, diversified portfolios can deliver consistent alpha without overriding the investor’s equity allocation decision. Combining passive and active approaches in a low active share solution can be an effective and efficient way of accessing equity markets.
Access fee
- Non-subscribers - $40 for three-month access
- Full Radar subscribers – free
Abstract
Trends in fiduciary responsibility, technology and client expectations are making it increasingly hard for advisers to rely solely on commission from selling investment products. Building a strong and sustainable business on fee-based revenue is possible with an approach such as the seasonal planning model. The model is outlined along with the benefits to both the client and the adviser.
(Although the article is set in the US context, the article may be useful in providing helpful insights for NZ advisory businesses in planning future growth.)
Access fee
- Non-subscribers - $40 for three-month access
- Full Radar subscribers – free
Abstract
In 2001 Vanguard devised the Vanguard Adviser’s Alpha concept, outlining how advisers could add value (alpha) through relationship-oriented services such as providing cogent wealth management in financial planning, discipline and guidance, rather than by trying to outperform the market. This paper takes this framework further by attempting to quantify the benefits that advisers can add relative to others who are not using such strategies. It focuses on the most common tools for adding value, encompassing both investment-oriented and relationship-oriented strategies and services.
Although the contents of the module are set in the US context, the underlying principles also apply in the New Zealand context.
Access fee
- Non-subscribers - $40 for three-month access
- Full Radar subscribers – free
Abstract
This working paper discusses decumulation options including self-management, home equity release products and a variety of annuity products. It is particularly concerned with options for middle-income groups who generally are ill-prepared to manage the large lump sums they often receive such as, for example, from KiwiSaver or selling the family home to downsize. New Zealand’s retirement income framework is outlined, the role of advisers examined, and the various decumulation options currently available in New Zealand are assessed. An argument for some form of annuity or income product in New Zealand is presented.
Access fee
- Non-subscribers - $40 for three-month access
- Full Radar subscribers – free
Abstract
Earlier analysis by the authors into investors' evolving asset choices, their drivers and underlying rationale, is extended to cover these investment features over the 2013-2015 period. The research identified that while some trends are common across all investor groups, others are specific to a particular group. As a result of dealing with a number of post-2008 factors, outcome-oriented investing has become increasingly important as investors seek to manage market volatility and ultra-low interest rates.
Access fee
- Non-subscribers - $40 for three-month access
- Full Radar subscribers – free
Abstract
This article reviews the different aspects of the asset allocation debate. It starts with the most widely discussed disagreement: the differences between the variation in returns over time (the focus of Brinson’s 1986 study) and the variation in returns across portfolios (the heart of Jahnke’s 1997 critique of Brinson). It explores the impact of the sample used in the Brinson study on the results and the study’s implications for an investor with a broader set of investment options. Finally, it reports on the historical “success” of active management in increasing a portfolio’s returns and/or decreasing its volatility.
Access fee
- Non-subscribers - $40 for three-month access
- Full Radar subscribers – free
Abstract
The shortcomings of the Modern Portfolio Theory with respect to the use of ETFs in building portfolios is explained. The benefits of using ETFs over traditional actively managed funds is illustrated using a global equity portfolio example. The author challenges the notion of successfully using a DIY approach to ETFs.
Access fee
- Non-subscribers - $40 for three-month access
- Full Radar subscribers – free